The threat of terrorist acts or such action has existed for thousands of years. Despite the history of a modern nation-state, the use of terrorism by governments and those who face their power are badly understood. The meaning of this word is very clear when it comes to acts and artists in the real world, it becomes confusing. A part of this is due to the use of terrorist tactics by the actor at all levels in social and political environments.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, were the acts of war against the United States, peaceful people throughout the world, and the very principles of liberty and human dignity. The United States, together with our Coalition partners, has fought back and will win this war. We will hold the perpetrators responsible and work to prevent the recurrence of similar atrocities on any scale – whether at home or abroad. The War on Terror extends beyond the current armed conflict that arose out of the attacks of September 11, 2001, and embraces all facets of continuing the US. efforts to bring an end to the scourge of terrorism. Ultimately, we will win the long war to defeat the terrorists and their kill ideology.
We are deprived of al-Qaeda’s safety in Afghanistan and have instead helped increase the democratic government. After a terrorist sanctuary regime by the Tamil Taliban regime, Afghanistan is now a full partner in the war on Terror.
The Iraqi-linked multinational coalition aggressively acts in a war against the Iraqi terrorists. Together, we are working to secure a joint, stable and democratic Iraq. Which is now a new war of terrorism in the heart of the Middle East.
We have significantly reduced the Al-Qaeda network. Most of the people in Al-Qaeda network, including Khalid Shaykh Muhammad, mastermind of plots for 11 attacks on 11 September, have captured or killed. We also killed other key Al-Qaeda members, such as Abu Musab al-Zarkawi, who was the operational commander of the Iraqi group, who feared the lives of endless American forces and innocent Iraqis.
We have launched an unprecedented international campaign to fight terrorism. Which has made it difficult, costly and dangerous for Al-Qaida and related terrorist groups to raise and move money.
There is a broad and growing global consensus that deliberately targeted goals of innocents are not justified by any calling or cause.
Many countries have fought to fight terrorism with uninterrupted cooperation on law enforcement, intelligence, military and diplomatic activities.
We have helped prevent and counter the future attacks in Homeland by increasing our architecture of terrorism by designing the Department of Homeland Security, the Directorate of National Intelligence, and the National Counter-Realism Center. Overall, the United States and our partners have disrupted several serious plots since September 11, including al-Qa’ah plots to attack inside the United States.
Numerous countries which were part of the problem before September 11, are becoming more and more a part of the solution. And these changes have come in the main areas without the temporary arrangements of friendly practices.
Terrorist networks are more dispersed and less focused today. It is more dependent on a common ideologically motivated small cell and directed by the central command structure.
While the United States government and its partners have broken many attacks, we are not able to stop them all. From Bali to Beslan to Baghdad, terrorists attacked in many places around the world.
When we have made significant improvements in our air, land, sea and border security, our Homeland is not free from the attack.
Terrorists have used the weapons of mass destruction to bring more devastating attacks against the United Nations, our allies, partners and other interests around the world.
Some states, such as Syria and Iran, sponsor terrorist activities abroad and keep the terrorists at home.
The ongoing fight for independence in Iraq has been twisted by a terrorist campaign as a rallying cry.
With the increased use of the Internet and the media, our terrorists will be able to communicate, recruit, train, rally support, religion change.
1. Deliberate Planning
2. Create Fear & Terror
3. Hit the Target
4. Infuse Uncertainty & Anxiety
5. Achievement of Interest & Objective
6. No Limited Boundaries
Effects Terrorism has on our Nation
Terrorism has happened throughout history, but today the world is experiencing a global reincarnation of attacks. Today it affects only small communities, such as those of different Third World countries who suffered regular terrorist attacks, but the whole world is becoming more familiar with Arab and Muslim names. Terrorist violence is increasing today and has informed the citizen about various types of terrorism around the world. Even with the Resurrection, the world is facing terrorism, Nation can do whatever it takes to eliminate terrorism.
Terrorists have not only tried to create panic but have tried to weaken the political leadership in the government and trust and target. Terrorism designed for psychological effects that reach out to the immediate victims of the attack. Fear means terrorists and therefore a huge crowd, such as the rival ethnic or religious group, is afraid of the entire country and its political control or the entire international community. Terrorist groups usually small and have few members, limited weapons, and other resources. For this reason, they rely on devastating acts of intense bloody and hit-and-run violence to attract attention to their group. Through media, they can make the big noise for themselves and rival people.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE ISIS
Throughout the year, much flexibility and adaptability of terrorism contributed to the confusion. People who want to disturb, re-order or destroy status quests have constantly sought new and creative ways to achieve their goals. Changes in the tactics and techniques of terrorists significant, but the number of reasons used in terrorism and the number of social references are even more significant.
Nationalism is the worship of people or the group’s interests or cultures of the nation. Generally, nationalists share one common ethnic background and want to establish or retrieve the Motherland.
Religious extremists often reject the authority of secular governments and see legal methods that are naked based on their religious beliefs. They look at the efforts of modernizing the influence of traditional culture, which contaminate them.
Special interest groups include people on the radical Frank of many legitimate reasons; Eg, people who use terrorism to support conflicting views, animal rights, radical environmentalism. These groups believe that violence is morally justified to achieve their goals.
TYPES OF TERRORISM
- Civil disorder
- Political terrorism
- Non-Political terrorism
- Limited political terrorism
- Official or state terrorism
The Use of Force against Terrorists
It has been discussed that states can use force against terrorists on the basis of other countries. The relevant provisions of the UN Charter do not give a definitive answer, but it should interpret. The current article suggests that during the last two decades, the Charter’s governance has re-adjusted. So that under the most condescension, sanctioning a tremendous response to terrorism. In order to explain development, it is in accordance with the existing law of 1989, to the existing international law. It argues that 20 years ago a restricted approach to securing anti-terrorism militias has strained. As far as the collective responses are concerned, it was no longer controversial.
So those security councils may authorize the use of force against terrorists; However, it is far more controversial than doing so, in the last two decades. The international community has recognized the rights of states to use the unilateral force against terrorists. This new practice justified under the extended theory of self-defense. It can explain as a part of a strong international policy against terrorism. And also, it is a part of the overall tendency to see the exception of force restrictions in favor of more than 20 years ago. In contrast, it has resulted in a normative flow affecting the main limitations of self-defense conventional principles. It also increases the risk of abuse.